Home | 1001portails | 1001annonces

sci.math     [Liste des Groupes]   refresh

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

Date Sujet  Auteur
19.01.
o ? alternative theorem in higher dim
19.01.
o Intermediate Accounting Global Edition 2e By Spiceland solution manual
19.01.
o Intermediate Accounting Global Edition 2e By Spiceland test bank
18.01.
o Geometry with triangle.
18.01.
o Nuel Belnap,Paul Benacerraf,Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem are you? a
18.01.
o Another question about NFU/stratification
18.01.
o +page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plu
18.01.
* Question about NFU
18.01.
+- Re: Question about NFU
18.01.
+- Re: Question about NFU
18.01.
+- Re: Question about NFU
18.01.
`- Re: Question about NFU
18.01.
o Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million in prize money for proving Gene
18.01.
o Meira Hockman,Sameerah Jamal,Abdul Kara,Arnold Knopfmacher,Wen Chi Kou of Witwat
18.01.
* There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
18.01.
+- Why is John "Troll Boy" Gabriel such a failure? Partly, he's just thousands of y
18.01.
`* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 +* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 |`* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 | +* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 | |+- Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 | |`* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 | | `- Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 | `- Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 +* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
19.01.
 |`- Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
18.01.
 `* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
18.01.
  `* Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
18.01.
   `- Re: There is no such thing as an irrational number. This was known by Euclid. Proof
18.01.
o Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation 6th Global Edition solution manual
18.01.
o Re: See How do the alleged top genius mathematicians cheat the so innocent students?
18.01.
o test bank for Global Business Today 5th Canadian Edition
17.01.
* -Christensen, Green and Tao as education parasites-- never want to fix errors of
17.01.
`* WARNING TO PARENTS OF CLAY COUNTY SD: AP wants your children to fail in school a
17.01.
 `- Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite
17.01.
o Re: Can you confirm?
17.01.
o NOVA needs to re-do its "Day the Dinosaurs Died" as too much exaggeration and no
17.01.
o Re: Can you confirm?
17.01.
* Re: Isn't this so clear act of corruption by professional mathematicians on Quora mo
18.01.
`- Re: Isn't this so clear act of corruption by professional mathematicians on Quora mo
17.01.
o Re: Can you confirm?
17.01.
* Re: Was the negative number concept beening wrongly defined as real numbers?
18.01.
`- Re: Was the negative number concept beening wrongly defined as real numbers?
17.01.
* Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers
18.01.
+- Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers
17.01.
`- Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers
17.01.
o Re: Another huge fiction story in mathematics foundations (the complex numbers)
17.01.
o Re: How the myth of non-euclidean geometry was well established in mathematics?
17.01.
* Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
18.01.
`* Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
18.01.
 `- Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
17.01.
* Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
18.01.
+* Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
18.01.
|`- Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
17.01.
`- Re: What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!
17.01.
* Re: See How do the alleged top genius mathematicians cheat the so innocent students?
18.01.
`* Re: See How do the alleged top genius mathematicians cheat the so innocent students?
19.01.
 `- Re: See How do the alleged top genius mathematicians cheat the so innocent students?
17.01.
o Proof of turing test
17.01.
* No. I am sorry. Your new free and bound variables DOES NOT fix your bogus calcul
17.01.
+* Re: No. I am sorry. Your new free and bound variables DOES NOT fix your bogus calcul
17.01.
|`- Re: No. I am sorry. Your new free and bound variables DOES NOT fix your bogus calcul
17.01.
`- No. I am sorry. The Wacky New Calclueless is a dead end and cannot be fixed.
17.01.
* Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
+* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
|`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
+* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
|`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| +* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| |`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | +* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | |+- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | |`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | +* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | | +- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | | `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |  `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |   +* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |   |`- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |   `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | |    `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | | `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | |  `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | |   `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | +* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | |`- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| | `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
| `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
`* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
 `* Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID is still persisting... "We don't like your New Calculus
18.01.
  `- Re: Funny how the BIG STUPID John "Troll Boy" Gabriel deludes himself
17.01.
o Re: How the myth of non-euclidean geometry was well established in mathematics?
17.01.
o Re: What should a clever student do?
17.01.
* Re: Fiction numbers create fiction angles too
18.01.
`* Re: Fiction numbers create fiction angles too
19.01.
 `* Re: Fiction numbers create fiction angles too
19.01.
  `- Re: Fiction numbers create fiction angles too
17.01.
o Strategic Management 3rd Edition test bank
17.01.
o solution manual for Strategic Management 3rd Edition
17.01.
o Re: Can you draw?
17.01.
o Re: Can the aliens do that?
17.01.
* Re: Mathematicians And 'The Man Who Knew Infinity' - Inside Science
17.01.
`* Re: Mathematicians And 'The Man Who Knew Infinity' - Inside Science
17.01.
 `- Re: Mathematicians And 'The Man Who Knew Infinity' - Inside Science
17.01.
o Re: Fermat's Last theorem short proof
17.01.
o Re: Primitive Pythagorean Triplets
16.01.
o Re: Diophantine equation : x^{2n} + y^{2m} = z^2
16.01.
o Re: Roots of polynomials
16.01.
o Re: Diophantine Equation (x^3 + y^2 + z^p = 0)
16.01.
o All you Sons of Bitches'll be Atheists on Dig my Arks day
16.01.
o Univ Witwatersrand,Robert Joubert,Jonathan Keartland,Nukri Komin,Bruce Mellado,D
16.01.
* Calculus with maximum of minimum.
18.01.
+- Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
18.01.
`* Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
17.01.
 `* Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
18.01.
  +- Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
18.01.
  `* Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
17.01.
   `- Re: Calculus with maximum of minimum.
16.01.
* Hello Dolly
17.01.
+* Re: Hello Dolly
18.01.
|`- Re: Hello Dolly
16.01.
`- Re: Hello Dolly
16.01.
o Canadian Organizational Behaviour 10th Canadian Edition solution manual
16.01.
o test bank for Canadian Organizational Behaviour 10th Canadian Edition
16.01.
* How does one prove that a3+b3+c3=3abc?
16.01.
`* Re: How does one prove that a3+b3+c3=3abc?
17.01.
 `- Re: How does one prove that a3+b3+c3=3abc?
15.01.
o test bank for Operations and Supply Chain Management: The Core 4th Edition
15.01.
o Economic Issues and Policy 6th Edition test bank
15.01.
o 4:40:58 education parasite Christensen > Poor, demented//is Jordan Brown, Zach C
15.01.
o David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias Franz,John Jardine,Mass
15.01.
* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
+* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
|+- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
|`- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
`* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
 `- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
+* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
|`* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
16.01.
| `* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
16.01.
|  `* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
16.01.
|   `* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
17.01.
|    `- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
`* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
 `- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
o David Bowie & Dolores O'Riordan both said Good Bye, not Bad Bye, today.
15.01.
* Fermat's last theorem proof
16.01.
+- Re: Fermat's last theorem proof
16.01.
+- Re: Fermat's last theorem proof
15.01.
`* Re: Fermat's last theorem proof
15.01.
 `* Re: Fermat's last theorem proof
15.01.
  `- Re: Fermat's last theorem proof
15.01.
* I am a genius and my IQ is above 160, but I do not know everything.
15.01.
+- Re: I am a genius and my IQ is above 160, but I do not know everything.
15.01.
+- Re: I am a moron, my IQ is 60 and I know nothing about math
15.01.
+- Re: I am a genius and my IQ is above 160, but I do not know everything.
15.01.
`- Re: I am a genius and my IQ is above 160, but I do not know everything.
15.01.
o Youtube Channel on Math Classes, funny English, for students of the world
15.01.
o solution manual for Employment Law for Human Resource Practice 6th Edition
15.01.
o Employment Law for Human Resource Practice 6th Edition test bank
15.01.
o Re: You cant prove definitions. The fallacious 0.999... = 1 is an ill-formed definit
15.01.
o Nice project for graduate students in astronomy, physics-- how ordered are the
15.01.
o test bank for Business Statistics 3rd Canadian Edition
14.01.
o Is all of material physics, second dimension?
14.01.
o Design and Analysis of Experiments 9th Edition solution manual
14.01.
* Meigan Aronson, Bill Bassichis, Katrin Becker, Melanie Becker, Texas A&M, are yo
14.01.
`- Re: Uh-oh Archie loses his place, repeats old diagram:
14.01.
o _start all over, for I need Hund's rule correct Re: page2-3, PHYSICS: The PLUTO
14.01.
o Charge is direction of motion of magnetic monopoles and where Coulomb's law is m
14.01.
* UKSA & NASA confirm 1 Ark per Planet
15.01.
`- Re: UKSA & NASA confirm 1 Ark per Planet
14.01.
* Baby Face (1926)
14.01.
`* Re: Baby Face (1926)
14.01.
 `* Re: Baby Face (1926)
15.01.
  `- Re: Baby Face (1926)
14.01.
* Stuart Brown,Robijn Bruinsma,Charles Buchanan,Wesley Campbell,Gene D. Block, of
14.01.
`- Re: Archimedes Thrusting Bar Magnet Faraday can't get his act together.
14.01.
* 9:29:52education parasite Christensen wrote: >Warning//Sebastien Proulx, Jordan
16.01.
+* Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 whil
16.01.
|`* Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 whil
17.01.
| `* Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite
18.01.
|  `- Re: Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite
14.01.
`- Re: Archimedes Thrusting Bar Magnet Faraday just can't quit using his obsolete Pluto
14.01.
o Game of Life
14.01.
* Calculus with F(x)=f(x)-x
16.01.
`* Re: Calculus with F(x)=f(x)-x
15.01.
 `* Re: Calculus with F(x)=f(x)-x
17.01.
  `* Re: Calculus with F(x)=f(x)-x
16.01.
   `- Re: Calculus with F(x)=f(x)-x
14.01.
o Vector with four points.
14.01.
* Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
16.01.
+* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
16.01.
|`* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
17.01.
| `* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
17.01.
|  `* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
17.01.
|   `- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
16.01.
+- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
+* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
|`* Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
15.01.
| +- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
| +- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
| `- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
+- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
+- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
`- Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim: Do they really not teach about geometric series at Augsbur
14.01.
* S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
+* S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
|+* Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
||`* Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
|| +- Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
|| `- Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
|`* Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
| `* Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
15.01.
|  `- Re: S = Lim S permeates all of your mythmatics.
14.01.
+- Outrageous errors permeate all of John "Troll Boy" Gabriel's mythmatics.
14.01.
`- Multiple errors permeate all of John "Troll Boy" Gabriel's mythmatics.
13.01.
o What is bladder continuity? And the prostate continuum by MitchNews
13.01.
* What is mathematical continuity?
14.01.
+- Re: What is mathematical continuity?
14.01.
+* Re: What is mathematical continuity?
14.01.
|`* Re: What is mathematical continuity?
16.01.
| `- Re: What is mathematical continuity?
14.01.
`* Re: What is mathematical continuity?
14.01.
 `- Re: What is mathematical continuity?
13.01.
* why cannot Dr Tao understand the ellipse? see proof below //can never see that t
13.01.
`* Re: why cannot Dr Tao understand the ellipse? see proof below //can never see that t
14.01.
 `* Re: why cannot Dr Tao understand the ellipse? see proof below //can never see that t
15.01.
  +* Is UWO's,Matthias Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire failures of
16.01.
  |`* Does Dr. Tao really believe 3 OR 2 = 5, with 3 AND 2 = 1 Re: Is UWO's,Matthias F
17.01.
  | `- Christensen, Green and Tao as education parasites-- never want to fix errors of
14.01.
  `- Archie just can't resist repeating old diagrams. Pretty sad.
13.01.
* _page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plu
15.01.
+- WARNING TO STUDENTS: AP wants you to fail like he did.
13.01.
`* Generator & Battery models; pages2-3 PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVER
13.01.
 +* Re: Generator & Battery models; pages2-3 PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVER
13.01.
 |`* incorporating Hund's rule Re: start all over, for I need Hund's rule correct Re:
14.01.
 | `* geometry understanding of charge Re: incorporating Hund's rule Re: start all ove
14.01.
 |  +* Charge in Physics Re: geometry understanding of charge Re: incorporating Hund's
14.01.
 |  |`* Charge in Physics are magnetic monopoles Re: geometry understanding of charge Re
15.01.
 |  | +* Re: Charge in Physics are magnetic monopoles Re: geometry understanding of charge Re
15.01.
 |  | |`* Re: Charge in Physics are magnetic monopoles Re: geometry understanding of charge Re
15.01.
 |  | | `* mistake in Halliday & Resnick magnetism pictures Re: Charge in Physics are magne
15.01.
 |  | |  `* misleading pictures for a dipole versus monopole Re: mistake in Halliday & Resni
16.01.
 |  | |   +* Re: misleading pictures for a dipole versus monopole Re: mistake in Halliday & Resni
16.01.
 |  | |   |`* deep theory question about bar magnets Re: misleading pictures for a dipole vers
16.01.
 |  | |   | `* metallic bond explained via magnetism Re: misleading pictures for a dipole versu
16.01.
 |  | |   |  `* the 1992 Halliday& Resnick corrects the mistake of earlier editions Re: magnetis
16.01.
 |  | |   |   `* HYASYS Re: the 1992 Halliday& Resnick corrects the mistake of earlier editions
16.01.
 |  | |   |    `* subject of neutrons and request a re-take of Rutherford gold leaf experiment Re:
16.01.
 |  | |   |     `* are neutrons composed of light waves? Re: HYASYS Re: the 1992 Halliday& Resnick
16.01.
 |  | |   |      `* Re: are neutrons composed of light waves? Re: HYASYS Re: the 1992 Halliday& Resnick
17.01.
 |  | |   |       `* Re: are neutrons composed of light waves? Re: HYASYS Re: the 1992 Halliday& Resnick
17.01.
 |  | |   |        `* Chemistry is all about the Faraday Law, going on inside of all atoms, no longer
17.01.
 |  | |   |         `* interior architecture of atoms-- where the Faraday law is going on
18.01.
 |  | |   |          `* solving the architecture of the Atom and getting rid of negative numbers with "l
18.01.
 |  | |   |           `* our new revised picture of what Atoms look like-- they have a Magnetosphere, whe
18.01.
 |  | |   |            `- our new revised picture of what Atoms look like-- they have a Magnetosphere, whe
15.01.
 |  | |   `* Protons involved in Chemistry bonding? Re: misleading pictures for a dipole vers
15.01.
 |  | |    `- Protons involved in Chemistry bonding? Re: misleading pictures for a dipole vers
14.01.
 |  | `- Re: Archimedes Monopole Faraday makes progress.. loses his bogus Pu atom, but gets l
14.01.
 |  `* Re: geometry understanding of charge Re: incorporating Hund's rule: Archie has no id
14.01.
 |   `* Eastside censorship
14.01.
 |    `- Re: Eastside censorship
13.01.
 `- Archie get lost in ascii art...
13.01.
o Amos Yarom,Shlomit Tarem,Ari Turner,Jeff Steinhauer, of Technion University, you
13.01.
* Probability with geometric.
13.01.
+- Re: Probability with geometric.
13.01.
+* Re: Probability with geometric.
15.01.
|`- Re: Probability with geometric.
13.01.
`- Re: Probability with geometric.
12.01.
* And now Sir Michael Atiyah, Was: Re: Swinnerton-Dyer
12.01.
`* Re: And now Sir Michael Atiyah, Was: Re: Swinnerton-Dyer
12.01.
 `* Re: And now Sir Michael Atiyah, Was: Re: Swinnerton-Dyer
12.01.
  `- Re: And now Sir Michael Atiyah, Was: Re: Swinnerton-Dyer
12.01.
* Fascinating Fibonacci Numbers Property
13.01.
`* Re: Fascinating Fibonacci Numbers Property
13.01.
 `* Re: Fascinating Fibonacci Numbers Property
13.01.
  `* Re: Fascinating Fibonacci Numbers Property
13.01.
   `- Re: Fascinating Fibonacci Numbers Property
12.01.
o Starbucks Coffee
12.01.
* Trigonometric Question
14.01.
`- Re: Trigonometric Question
12.01.
o Anja Karliczek, Thomas Rachel,Harald Andres Helfgott,Madeleine Jotz Lean,Ralf Me
12.01.
o Numerus "Numerans Numeratus"
12.01.
* Sonja Currie,Alexander Davison,Mensah Folly-Gbetoula,Marie Grobbelaar,Yorick Har
12.01.
`- Re: Sonja Currie,Alexander Davison,Mensah Folly-Gbetoula,Marie Grobbelaar,Yorick Har
12.01.
o Betsie Jonck,Jesse Alt,Margaret Archibald,Charlotte Brennan of Witwatersrand Uni
12.01.
o Allora lo scienziato tacque...
12.01.
* The BIG STUPID (mainstream academics) is becoming more and more desperate.
13.01.
`- Re: The BIG STUPID (mainstream academics) is becoming more and more desperate.
12.01.
o Re: Calculus with f(x), g(x).
12.01.
* Gender in mathematics
13.01.
+- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
+- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
+- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
+- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
+- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
`- Re: Gender in mathematics
12.01.
o my geophysics CV
12.01.
* [Spamish] Math Obfuscation
15.01.
+* Re: [Spamish] Math Obfuscation
15.01.
|`- Re: [Spamish] Math Obfuscation
12.01.
`- Re: [Spamish] Math Obfuscation
12.01.
o Re: Andrew Wiles, why send out your attack dogs Franz, Moroney, Christensen. Just ad
12.01.
* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
12.01.
`* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
13.01.
 `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
14.01.
  `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
   +* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
   |`* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | +* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | |`* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | | `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
17.01.
   | |  `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
18.01.
   | |   `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
18.01.
   | |    `- Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | +* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | |`- Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
16.01.
   | `- Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
   +* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
   |`- Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
14.01.
   `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
    `* Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
15.01.
     `- Re: Yes, Euler defined S = Lim S and the evidence is irrefutable. Euler claimed 9.9
11.01.
* PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium,
13.01.
+- Re: PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium,
12.01.
+* PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium,
12.01.
|`* page2 Re: PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes P
13.01.
| `* Re: page2 Re: PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes P
13.01.
|  `* Gene D. Block,B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick of UCLA, are you as stu
13.01.
|   `- Ap forgets, and uses his old, discredited (by himself!) picture...
12.01.
+- Re: PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium,
12.01.
`- sorry, a textbook for sophomore college Re: PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY
11.01.
* Re: Types of named trolls in mathematics
13.01.
`- Re: Types of named trolls in mathematics
11.01.
o Starbucks Coffee
11.01.
* Trig identity
14.01.
+- Re: Trig identity
12.01.
+* Re: Trig identity
12.01.
|`- Re: Trig identity
12.01.
+* Re: Trig identity
12.01.
|+- Re: Trig identity
12.01.
|`- Re: Trig identity
12.01.
+* Re: Trig identity
12.01.
|`- Re: Trig identity
12.01.
`* Re: Trig identity
12.01.
 `- Re: Trig identity
11.01.
o Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming,UWO's Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, Da
11.01.
o Luca Avena, K.Batenburg, M.Bhargava, Martin Bright, Peter Bruin of Univ Leiden//
11.01.
* AP's thoughts 11JAN2019// why it is impossible for chemistry to exist with proto
11.01.
`* Heavy water first proof of radioactivity is growth not decay Re: AP's thoughts 1
11.01.
 `- muon to muon bonding Re: Heavy water first proof of radioactivity is growth not
11.01.
o Turing.txt
11.01.
* Alien Mathematics
13.01.
+- Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
+- Re: Alien Mathematics
11.01.
+- Re: Alien Mathematics
11.01.
+* Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
|`- Re: Alien Mathematics
11.01.
`* Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
 +- Re: Alien Mathematics
11.01.
 `* Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
  +* Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
  |`* Re: Alien Mathematics
13.01.
  | `* Re: Alien Mathematics
14.01.
  |  `- Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
  `* Re: Alien Mathematics
12.01.
   `- Re: Alien Mathematics
11.01.
* Re: Refutation of Halting Problem proofs
11.01.
`- Re: Refutation of Halting Problem proofs
11.01.
o Math failure BKK insanely jealous
11.01.
* Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
11.01.
+* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|`* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
| `* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
13.01.
|  +* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
14.01.
|  |`- Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|  +* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|  |`* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|  | `- Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|  `* Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
12.01.
|   `- Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
11.01.
+- Re: John "Troll Boy" Gabriel made quite a few mistakes in his Wacky New Calclueless
11.01.
`- Re: Newton made quite a few mistakes in his De Analysi. He was not as meticulous as
11.01.
* My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
+- Re: My approach in dealing morons like John "Troll Boy" Gabriel
11.01.
+* My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
|`* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
| `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
|  `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
13.01.
|   +* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
14.01.
|   |`- Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
|   `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|    `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|     `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|      `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|       `* Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|        +- Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
12.01.
|        `- Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
`- Re: My approach in dealing with those who cannot admit they are wrong after being co
11.01.
* Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
11.01.
`* Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
11.01.
 `* Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
14.01.
  +- Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
13.01.
  +* Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
14.01.
  |`- Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
11.01.
  `* Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
13.01.
   `- Re: Why mainstream academic morons hate the New Calculus.
11.01.
* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
11.01.
`* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
15.01.
 +* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
15.01.
 |`* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
15.01.
 | `* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
16.01.
 |  `* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
16.01.
 |   `- Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
15.01.
 `* Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
15.01.
  `- Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
11.01.
o test bank for MGMT 3rd Third Canadian Edition
11.01.
o Sending Reverse Factorial in Math Crazy?
10.01.
o MGMT 3rd Third Canadian Edition by Williams test bank
10.01.
o test bank for abc’s of relationship selling throug h service 6th canadian edit
10.01.
o Advertising, Promotion, and other aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications
10.01.
* 7:43:26education parasite Christensen > No???//is John Horton Conway a education
12.01.
`* Mathedman points redirects finger at Dr. Conway
14.01.
 `* Not only geometric series, but Dr. Conway can never teach the truth about the el
15.01.
  +* Christensen asks, how is it possible to have Conway do numbers that represent ge
16.01.
  |`* Is Dr. Conway spoiled stubborn? Re: Christensen asks, how is it possible to have
17.01.
  | `- -Christensen, Conway as education parasites-- never want to fix errors of math,
14.01.
  `- Re: Not only geometric series, but Dr. Conway can never teach the truth about the el
10.01.
o test bank for Macroeconomics: Canada in the Global Environment 10th Edition
10.01.
o Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 9th Edition solution
10.01.
o test bank for Staffing Organizations 8th Edition
10.01.
o Staffing Organizations 8th Edition solution manual
10.01.
* Re: ANCIENT INDIAN MATHEMATICIANS WERE WAY AHEAD OF THE REST OF THE WORLD
13.01.
`- Re: ANCIENT INDIAN MATHEMATICIANS WERE WAY AHEAD OF THE REST OF THE WORLD
10.01.
o Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction 4th Edition solution manual
10.01.
o Management Accounting: Information for Decision-Making and Strategy Execution 6t
10.01.
o Management Accounting: Information for Decision-Making and Strategy Execution 6t
10.01.
* 48° Teorema Lineare.
10.01.
`- Re: 48° Teorema Lineare.
10.01.
o The Governnent Shutdown
10.01.
* AP's thoughts as of 10JAN2019// discussing universal ellipse constant 1/137
10.01.
+* constants .00131 versus .007299 Re: AP's thoughts as of 10JAN2019// discussing u
10.01.
|`* why it is impossible for electron to be .5 whilst proton 938 Re: AP's thoughts a
10.01.
| `* AP model of atom replaces altogether the Bohr Model Re: why it is impossible for
10.01.
|  `* Bohr model was zombie particles of proton electron Re: AP model of atom replaces
10.01.
|   `* star-atoms shining in the night Re: Bohr model was zombie particles of proton el
11.01.
|    `* Re: star-atoms shining in the night Re: Bohr model was zombie particles of proton el
11.01.
|     +* dull or nonscientists always lack comprehension
12.01.
|     |+- Re: dull or nonscientists always lack comprehension
11.01.
|     |`- why most elements are found together with their nearest neighbors on the periodi
11.01.
|     `- Re: star-atoms shining in the night Re: Bohr model was zombie particles of proton el
10.01.
`- Re: AP's thoughts ... lost my way fumbling with numbers. I'll try fumbling with wor
10.01.
* 59:49education parasite Gabriel// Univ Witwatersrand,Arthur Every,Andrew Forbes,
10.01.
`- Re: 59:49education parasite Gabriel// Univ Witwatersrand,Arthur Every,Andrew Forbes,
10.01.
o 6:59:49education parasite Gabriel// Univ Witwatersrand,Arthur Every,Andrew Forbe
10.01.
o Re: Can any one claim that (1 = 0.999...) now a days?
10.01.
o Diophantine Linear Equations
10.01.
* Calculus with indefinite integral.
10.01.
`* Re: Calculus with indefinite integral.
10.01.
 `- Re: Calculus with indefinite integral.
10.01.
* The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
17.01.
+- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
| `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|  +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|  `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
+- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
+* Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|+* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
||`* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
13.01.
|| `* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
13.01.
||  `- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|+- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|+* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
||`* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|| +- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|| `- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|`* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
| `* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|  `* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|   `* Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|    +- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
12.01.
|    `- Re: Free and bound variables - LMAO.
10.01.
+* Does math failure John "Troll Boy" Gabriel still think the derivative of y=x is
16.01.
|`- Re: Does math failure John "Troll Boy" Gabriel still think the derivative of y=x is
10.01.
+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
|`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
| `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
|`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
| `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|    `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     |+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     ||+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     |||`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
17.01.
|     ||| `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
17.01.
|     |||  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
17.01.
|     |||   `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     ||`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     || +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     || `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     ||  `- Re: The moronic John "Troll Boy" Gabriel's Wacky New Calcluess is complete waste of
16.01.
|     |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
16.01.
|     | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
17.01.
|     |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |    `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |     `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   |  +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   |    `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |   `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      |`- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
18.01.
|     |      `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|     +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|     |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|     | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|     |  +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|     |  `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|     `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|      +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |+- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |+- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |  +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |  |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |  | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |    `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     |+- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     |    `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |     `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |      `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |       `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |        `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |  |  |         `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |   +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  |   `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |    `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |+* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     ||`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     || +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     || |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     || | +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     || | `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     || `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |    `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |     +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |     |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |     | +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |     | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |     |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |     |   `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |     `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |      +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
14.01.
|      |   | |     |      |`- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     |      `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | |     `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |`- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |  `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |   `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |    +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |    |`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |    | `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |    |  `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   |    `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
13.01.
|      |   `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|      +* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|      |`- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|      `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|       `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|        `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|         `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
11.01.
|          `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|           `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|            `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|             `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|              +- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|              `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|               `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|                `* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
12.01.
|                 `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
`* Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
 `- Re: The New Calculus is the only correct formulation of calculus.
10.01.
* Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
+* Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
11.01.
|`* Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
11.01.
| +- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
11.01.
| `- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
+* Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
|+- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
|`- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
+- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
`- Re: Why all straight lines have slopes but not all slopes are derivatives.
10.01.
* 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
18.01.
+- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
+* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
18.01.
|`- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
+* E8'M5
10.01.
|`* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
| `* E8'M5
10.01.
|  `* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
|   `* E8'M5
10.01.
|    `- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
+* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
|`- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
+* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
18.01.
|+- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
|`- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
`* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
 +- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
 `* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
  `* Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
   `- Re: 0 = ∞ = 0.000...1
10.01.
* Calculus with g(t).
11.01.
`- Re: Calculus with g(t).
10.01.
* Re: Cactus Communications
10.01.
`* Re: Cactus Communications
17.01.
 +- Thomas should move to China, Russia, or North Korea.
10.01.
 `* Re: Cactus Communications
12.01.
  `* Re: Cactus Communications
12.01.
   `- [OT] Usenet (was: Cactus Communications)
10.01.
* Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
10.01.
+* Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
15.01.
|`* Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
15.01.
| `- Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
10.01.
`* Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
10.01.
 `- Re: Why math failure and psycho troll BKK is getting nowhere
09.01.
* Re: US govt shutdown, please all 50 governors call for a referendum today to have th
10.01.
`* the Constitution of the new nation that is US+EU supernation//SCIENCE COUNCIL RU
15.01.
 `* God bless you Australia for mending the tick infested python //SCIENCE COUNCIL R
16.01.
  `- UK please take Mr. Tusk’s advice for Russia wants to divide all of Europe//SC
09.01.
o Malum wrote: >degrees//Is Goran Lindblad,Hakan Snellman, Jouko Mickelsson like M
09.01.
* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
10.01.
`* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
11.01.
 +* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
 |`* Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly
15.01.
 | +- Re: How can be there any infinity (in mathematics) if the natural numbers are truly

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

   
Add to My Google
My yahoo !
Add to Netvibes